WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Election deniers moving closer to GOP mainstream as Trump allies fill Congress, report shows
Traffic updates: Easter weekend set to begin
Japan's lunar craft lands successfully but can't generate solar power
Second murder charge laid after death of Ōpōtiki Mongrel Mob Barbarians president Steven Taiatini
Emma Weymouth channels wedding chic in a white gown at Cannes Film Festival
Tear gas as crowds clash with riot police in Russia
Iran sentences Nobel laureate Narges Mohammadi to additional prison term
Chinese city reports coronavirus found on ice cream
NASCAR star Kyle Larson is embracing his Indianapolis 500 debut, right down to milking a cow
South China Sea News: Naval base expansion 'gives China more power in disputed sea'
Election deniers moving closer to GOP mainstream as Trump allies fill Congress, report shows
Eli Lilly's new ad says weight